Impact Investing: Making the Case to Your Trustees

Several months ago, Exponent Philanthropy and partners Mission Investors Exchange and Arabella Advisors released Essentials of Impact Investing: A Guide for Small-Staffed Foundations. Below is an excerpt from the complimentary and actionable guide, geared to foundations with few or no staff that want to align their investments and missions. 

By David Wood, Initiative for Responsible Investment

The early stages of impact investment adoption for foundations lie at the board level.

The idea to explore impact investment as a philanthropic strategy often comes from a single board member, or from staff or consultants who have seen other foundations adopt impact investing. Board engagement is a critical next step for implementing an impact investing strategy: learning what individual board members think about the possibility, educating the board on the state of the field, and taking a broad survey of potential areas of interest or investment opportunities that engage the board’s imagination.

In most cases, board approval is required for a foundation to engage in impact investing, and that often requires ongoing, high-touch engagement from impact investing champions— whether staff or fellow board members. Early board engagement often involves peer-to-peer presentation from board members who are more familiar with the field—and an allaying of the skepticism of board members who may fear that impact investments may not perform well financially or socially.

Continue reading →

New Guide to Impact Investing for Small-Staffed Foundations

Pages from Essentials of Impact Investing full layout_v8Exponent Philanthropy, together with partners Mission Investors Exchange and Arabella Advisors, is pleased to announce the release of Essentials of Impact Investing: A Guide for Small-Staffed Foundations.                 

Below is an excerpt from the actionable guide—a Q&A with Luther M. Ragin Jr., former president and chief executive officer of the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) who helped accelerate the development of the impact investing industry. He speaks to opportunities for small-staffed foundations that want to invest for impact. 

Q: How does impact investing from small-staffed foundations help create impact? 

A: The same way it would from foundations with large staffs or from other philanthropically minded organizations. But small foundations are unique in two noteworthy areas:

  • Flexibility. Their small size makes for nimble structures that can adapt or respond more readily than larger foundations. This nimbleness leads to clear signals on the part of funders and allows asset managers and social entrepreneurs to make sharp decisions based on these signals. It’s better to get a “no” in a matter of weeks than after a process of several months.
  • Specialized knowledge. Small-staffed foundations have unique understanding and expertise in particular geographic or program areas, or both. This can be leveraged to attract other outside investors who can capitalize on the foundation’s connections to the community.

Q: What are some of the specific strategies leaders in small-staffed foundations can use to play a role in moving capital in markets including or beyond their traditional grant-making activities?

Continue reading →

Foundation Impact Investors: Leaders in the Field

By Peter Berliner, Mission Investors Exchange

In the final post of this 3-part series on impact investing, we hear from the managing director of Mission Investors Exchange, a membership organization for foundations that use or are learning to use program-related and mission-related investing to accomplish their philanthropic goals. Read the series’ earlier posts on who makes impact investments and the strategies they favor.

The recently released Exponent Philanthropy survey results indicate that a significant number of foundation members are engaged in impact investing. It’s great to see these foundations adopting this strategy to complement their grants. By doing so, they are helping transform traditional approaches to philanthropy.

In 2011, the Foundation Center reported that overall about one in seven foundations were making impact investments. Only one-quarter were using their endowed funds to do so. We are seeing growing interest among foundations of all sizes in using these tools. We are even seeing ones that are seeking to align 100% of their investments with their mission. They are truly leaders in the field. Other trends in impact investing

Continue reading →

Foundation Impact Investors: Strategies They Favor

By Lauren Kotkin and Ruth Masterson, ASF

The first post in this 3-part series on impact investing looked at the ASF member foundations that make impact investments. Now we turn to the sorts of impact investments these members make. 

Among the 11% of ASF member foundations that make impact investments, the most common impact investing strategies are screens (59%), direct investments in private companies or funds (31%), and deposits at community development financial institutions (CDFIs) (10%).

  • Screens on stocks, bonds, or mutual funds—Screens, both positive and negative, are a straightforward way to act on your values and a great place to start your impact investing. When a longtime ASF member joined her foundation’s finance committee and took a close look at the foundation’s portfolio, she saw that the foundation was invested in companies whose practices and products were in direct contrast with the foundation’s mission. Her first recommendation as a committee member was to screen out those companies from the portfolio.

Continue reading →

Foundation Impact Investors: Who They Are, How Much They Earn

By Ruth Masterson and Lauren Kotkin, ASF 

In the first of a 3-part series on impact investing, we use data from our recent member survey to learn more about the ASF member foundations that make impact investments, and the returns they achieve.

Impact investing isn’t inherently riskier than other types of investments. This was clear in the results from our 2013 survey of ASF member foundations, the Foundation Operations and Management Survey. Impact investments can be part of a successful investment portfolio—and the evidence shows that they are for ASF members.

What is impact investing? It’s the intentional deployment of funds by investors who seek both social and financial returns. It grows out of the practice of socially responsible investing, which includes positive and negative screening and shareholder advocacy; and mission investing, or investments by mission-based organizations. Learn more about impact investing

Our survey results tell us that 11% of ASF member foundations engage in impact investing. Curious to learn more about these members, here’s what we found:

Continue reading →

Program Related Investments: A Fit for Your Foundation?

By Peter Berliner, Mission Investors Exchange

Peter BerlinerWhen you scroll through the agenda for the upcoming ASF National Conference and alight on Amp Up Your Impact with Program Related Investments, you may wonder, “How is this relevant to me?” Program Related Investments (PRIs) are in the realm of the giants—Annie E. Casey, Ford, and Gates. Can a small foundation with only handful of dollars (comparatively speaking) get into the act too?

The answer is, yes. In fact, foundations of all types and sizes throughout the country are already using PRIs and other mission investments to complement their grantmaking. Why? It could be because it makes more sense to loan money than to give it away to meet a short-term need for a construction loan or working capital. It’s also a way to idle capital to use in the neighborhoods you care about by making deposits in a community bank or credit union. It doesn’t have to be complicated to be effective. In addition, when a loan or equity investment is repaid, you get to use the dollars all over again. What’s greener than recycling cash? Continue reading →