New Regulations Spotlight Nonprofit Overhead

By Henry Berman, Exponent Philanthropy

It’s January in Washington, DC, and there is no shortage of pundits, politicians, and pollsters with wisdom as to what the 114th Congress and President Obama will do, or try to do, in the coming year. As philanthropists faced with funding opportunities today, we are likely better served by looking back and taking notice of a real change in regulations that took effect last month. The change could – and should – have a significant impact on all of us who make grants.

The federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued new regulations that rewrite the book on federal grantmaking in ways that will transform the relationship between nonprofits and governments at all levels – federal, state, and local.

The new rules mandate that nonprofits hired by government to provide services must be paid for the indirect costs they incur in doing so. In simple terms, OMB is declaring that nonprofits have overhead and administrative costs that should be paid. Kudos to OMB for recognizing the need to cover these costs that many of us as funders are called upon to help cover, effectively subsidizing what governments have, until now, refused to pay.

Continue reading →

Why Overhead Is a Bad Word – Part Two

By Sara Beggs, ASF

In my previous post on overhead, I discussed why funders might overvalue the concept of a low overhead ratio among nonprofits, including lack of trust in nonprofits, our fear of wasting the dollars we have, and our desire to quickly know we have impact. So, how can we ensure our giving builds on the best of those desires and leaves the rest the behind? Engage our minds.

Understand how overhead truly relates to impact. Recently, leaders at GuideStar, Charity Navigator, and BBB Wise Giving Alliance, the leading sources of information on nonprofits, sought to correct the misconception that overhead can stand on its own as an effective measure of performance.

In an open letter to the public, these leaders show data that reveal:

  • Organizations considered the most effective often have higher overhead ratios. Givewell.org does an in-depth analysis of specific nonprofits, with significant focus on impact.
  • Lack of investment in core operating support has several negative consequences, which ultimately reduce a nonprofit’s quality and sustainability. Watch If We Want Our Funding to Change the World to start conversations about the real costs of change.

Continue reading →

Why Overhead Is a Bad Word – Part One

By Sara Beggs, ASF

When we focus solely or predominantly on overhead, we can create what the Stanford Social Innovation Review has called “The Nonprofit Starvation Cycle.” We starve charities of the freedom they need to best serve the people and communities they are trying to serve. —OverheadMyth.com

Recently, I had a discussion about nonprofit effectiveness with my dad, a former Fortune 500 business executive and venture capital enthusiast. I was surprised to find someone so deliberate in his assessment of effectiveness in other realms to be so quick to judge a nonprofit’s effectiveness on a single factor: its amount of overhead. And yet he was. For him, the lower the overhead, the more effective the nonprofit.

Unfortunately, he’s not alone in his thinking. The nonprofit sector is plagued by this standard, but why? Why might we all be tempted to buy into the faulty logic that low overhead = effective nonprofit? Continue reading →