By Sara Beggs, ASF
The fundamental tenets of strategic philanthropy are that funders and their grantees should have clear goals, strategies based on sound theories of change, and robust methods for assessing progress toward their goals.—Paul Brest, former president of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and advocate of strategic philanthropy
Recent debates among philanthropic thought leaders question whether a strategic approach to philanthropy will indeed create the greatest impact. To process and evaluate the criticisms, Janis Reischmann, executive director of Hau’oli Mau Loa Foundation and member of ASF’s Impact Working Group, worked through the common critiques. Here’s where she landed.
Critique: When we practice strategic philanthropy, we’re closed to new ideas.
I do think there’s a discipline in practicing strategic philanthropy that requires one to stay the course, but that doesn’t mean that within “the course,” new ideas won’t surface and emerge. Also, if there’s a mechanism in place for getting feedback and making mid-course adjustments, we should be innovating and adding ideas regularly.

